Category Archives: IT



Old IT Page-Dump

This post is a copy/paste of an old deleted page containing a mixture of my own ignorance, obsolescence, and interesting content. I will probably edit it here and there if/when I discover errors or find new or updated content. Here it is:

Much of the content below is becoming out-dated, but may still be relevant or interesting. It is unlikely there will be any more updates and this page will probably be removed.


_____________________________________________________
Smart Meters – The “Facebook Helmet” | or, WTF? Noway!

_____________________________________________________
Cyber Psychology:::::::::
☻ Not particularly related to either IT or cyber-security; the following link is a well-written essay which presents persuasive perspectives on info-combat (anti-transparency), as well as a trove of thinking-material. It has obvious flaws, but is sure to make any security-conscious individual ponder deeply. While I doubt any reasonable mind will agree with the entirety of the essay, there is much to consider, and I have not yet found material which presents the other side’s perspective to this extent. I would be very interested to read a counter essay by Schneier. A great read for anyone seeking both security and transparency simultaneously: Protecting Sensitive Information: The Virtue of Self-Restraint – Dallas Boyd
*Note on above essay: Boyd’s admirable concept of “voluntary restraint” is a respectable proposal. However, our society has become far beyond repair concerning any collective values. We have seen that the only collective values we can hold must apply to the lowest common denominator, thus being poisoned from inception. I cannot help but to respect this writer, but I will never forget the horrible practices of this country; those which abuse its own citizenry and promulgate the epitome of deception, and those which have long since sold our greatest values for trinkets. If the US was not the champion of the world’s prison industry, and we had decent education – or a paradigm of kindness vs competition – I might place more confidence in such a proposal. It is unfortunately no more than optimistic idealism at this point. We have been so defiled by our government in this nation, that cynicism will easily outlive cockroaches. Such an intelligent writer might have also mentioned the government’s elaborately displayed lack of ability to distinguish common citizenry from terrorists, as well as their openly arrogant refusal to even try.

Cyber Signal – Signals Intelligence, or Amplifying the Monkey (cryptome)

Privacy, Internet security:::::::::
“100% Privacy for the individual is part of “personal security” the flip side 0% Privacy for the individual is part of “National security.”" -commenter on www.schneier.com
———————————————————————-
John Young Interviewed on Microsoft’s (law enforcement) Spyware Program, & other interesting links (on the youtube page):

———————————————————————-

Essay on the importance of privacy – Bruce Schneier

Surveillance Self Defense – EFF’s SSD Project

flossmanuals: Basic Internet Security

dcfldd – hard-drive wiper, forensics..

Tails – Privacy for anyone anywhere

YaCy – Decentralized Web Search

☻ Secure and “anonymize” your google searches with Scroogle & Firefox Addon

HTTPS Everywhere | Plugin/Addon, By the EFF

☻ “Anonymously-ish” search the web via proxy, without additional configurations by using Ixquick. To make this more effective, it is helpful to have NoScript installed. And here too, for mobile devices. To be truly anonymous, you’ll need something a little more robust, but the above works for general privacy purposes.

Local Shared Objects Understanding them, and what they mean for your privacy.

☻ Killing LSO’s Easily in Mozilla Firefox with BetterPrivacy. In Ubuntu and other distros, you can also simply chmod ???, or remove the files from: /home/”your system name”/.macromedia and: /home/”your system name”/.adobe (Note the dots “.” before the target directories) This manual method can possibly cause minor troubles with Flash videos

KISSmetrics – Spying on you whether you like it or not, regardless of your skills of evasion. Privacy punched in the nuts & ashkansoltani.org/docs/respawn_redux.html

☻ Chris Soghoian – Blog1 & Blog2

☻ Tyler Pitchford – Search And Seizure Explained, DEFCON 17 (video lecture)(coder of Azureus bittorrent client & attorney)

Encryption/Communications:::::::::

ronja.twibright.com – Information Transfer Over Light/Lasers (light modulation)

A superb article on Certificate Authorities, or https, by: Mokeysphere Developer

Practical Guide to PGP in Ubuntu

☻ Think Skype is Really Secure? It Aint, and Here’s One Reason Why (pdf).

☻ A Fascinating Essay on VOIP Encryption Flaws(pdf). Or, why not just pad it?

☻ A little on the CISCO Lawful Intercept Architecture, and a few other things. (PDF)

SSL-Strip – Bypassing HTTPS

Tonika – Social Routing with Organic Security? Know C(++)? Visit the site if you want to help out. Seems quite interesting.

Practical Cryptography – Learning Resource

DNS:::::::::

☻ Censorship Free DNS | One, Two, Three
tinyurl.com – Shorten your url for various purposes

Miscellaneous:::::::::

ANHOSTING – Really friendly, and really fairly priced webhosting. I’ve linked them here because I use them, and their customer service has been surprisingly friendly.

pagekite.net/ – Host your site on your own machine, anytime, anywhere. (based in Iceland!)

Bob Cromwell

☻ Gubment Forensics? | Or knowing who’s Fussing With Wikipedia

Bruce Schneier “The Security Mirage”

B.A.T.M.A.N.

Big Gubment, Their Tools, and so on:::::::::

Your ISP and the Government Best Friends Forever – Christopher Soghoian

☻ A few of their tools, resources and strange concepts:
CIFA
FISA
COINTELPRO
FISMA
CALEA
Total Information Awareness Act
Carnivore
Echelon
Narus
Lincoln
Lawful Interception
Patriot Act
NSA Blackroom, or Room 641A Watch an interview with Mark Klein below:

Other::::::::
wiki.echelon2.org/wiki/Main_Page – Private-contractor investigations, and other interesting stuff.
☻ One reason why Cisco sucks – Cisco and Abuses of Human Rights in China: Part 1

Known Unknown Knowns, and so on::::::::
www.thales-navalsystems.com/Pages/Solution.aspx?id=15436&pid=11604 – The Thales Group (“intelligence”)?

Anonymous Coward – The “(Score:5, Interesting)” that never was


While perusing /. I encountered an interesting comment posted by an AC. Despite my admitted tendency of squinting beneath a low brow when analyzing the technical aspects of IT, this comment resonated with me quite a bit. For this reason, it finds a spot here on EIA. Please enjoy:

by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 29, @10:16PM (#41174637)

Nobody Seems To Notice and Nobody Seems To Care – Government & Stealth Malware

In Response To Slashdot Article: Former Pentagon Analyst: China Has Backdoors To 80% of Telecoms 87

How many rootkits does the US[2] use officially or unofficially?

How much of the free but proprietary software in the US spies on you?

Which software would that be?

Visit any of the top freeware sites in the US, count the number of thousands or millions of downloads of free but proprietary software, much of it works, again on a proprietary Operating System, with files stored or in transit.

How many free but proprietary programs have you downloaded and scanned entire hard drives, flash drives, and other media? Do you realize you are giving these types of proprietary programs complete access to all of your computer’s files on the basis of faith alone?

If you are an atheist, the comparison is that you believe in code you cannot see to detect and contain malware on the basis of faith! So you do believe in something invisible to you, don’t you?

I’m now going to touch on a subject most anti-malware, commercial or free, developers will DELETE on most of their forums or mailing lists:

APT malware infecting and remaining in BIOS, on PCI and AGP devices, in firmware, your router (many routers are forced to place backdoors in their firmware for their government) your NIC, and many other devices.

Where are the commercial or free anti-malware organizations and individual’s products which hash and compare in the cloud and scan for malware for these vectors? If you post on mailing lists or forums of most anti-malware organizations about this threat, one of the following actions will apply: your post will be deleted and/or moved to a hard to find or ‘deleted/junk posts’ forum section, someone or a team of individuals will mock you in various forms ‘tin foil hat’, ‘conspiracy nut’, and my favorite, ‘where is the proof of these infections?’ One only needs to search Google for these threats and they will open your malware world view to a much larger arena of malware on devices not scanned/supported by the scanners from these freeware sites. This point assumed you’re using the proprietary Microsoft Windows OS. Now, let’s move on to Linux.

The rootkit scanners for Linux are few and poor. If you’re lucky, you’ll know how to use chkrootkit (but you can use strings and other tools for analysis) and show the strings of binaries on your installation, but the results are dependent on your capability of deciphering the output and performing further analysis with various tools or in an environment such as Remnux Linux. None of these free scanners scan the earlier mentioned areas of your PC, either! Nor do they detect many of the hundreds of trojans and rootkits easily available on popular websites and the dark/deep web.

Compromised defenders of Linux will look down their nose at you (unless they are into reverse engineering malware/bad binaries, Google for this and Linux and begin a valuable education!) and respond with a similar tone, if they don’t call you a noob or point to verifying/downloading packages in a signed repo/original/secure source or checking hashes, they will jump to conspiracy type labels, ignore you, lock and/or shuffle the thread, or otherwise lead you astray from learning how to examine bad binaries. The world of Linux is funny in this way, and I’ve been a part of it for many years. The majority of Linux users, like the Windows users, will go out of their way to lead you and say anything other than pointing you to information readily available on detailed binary file analysis.

Don’t let them get you down, the information is plenty and out there, some from some well known publishers of Linux/Unix books. Search, learn, and share the information on detecting and picking through bad binaries. But this still will not touch the void of the APT malware described above which will survive any wipe of r/w media. I’m convinced, on both *nix and Windows, these pieces of APT malware are government in origin. Maybe not from the US, but most of the ‘curious’ malware I’ve come across in poisoned binaries, were written by someone with a good knowledge in English, some, I found, functioned similar to the now well known Flame malware. From my experience, either many forum/mailing list mods and malware developers/defenders are ‘on the take’, compromised themselves, and/or working for a government entity.

Search enough, and you’ll arrive at some lone individuals who cry out their system is compromised and nothing in their attempts can shake it of some ‘strange infection’. These posts receive the same behavior as I said above, but often they are lone posts which receive no answer at all, AT ALL! While other posts are quickly and kindly replied to and the ‘strange infection’ posts are left to age and end up in a lost pile of old threads.

If you’re persistent, the usual challenge is to, “prove it or STFU” and if the thread is not attacked or locked/shuffled and you’re lucky to reference some actual data, they will usually attack or ridicule you and further drive the discussion away from actual proof of APT infections.

The market is ripe for an ambitious company or individual to begin demanding companies and organizations who release firmware and design hardware to release signed and hashed packages and pour this information into the cloud, so everyone’s BIOS is checked, all firmware on routers, NICs, and other devices are checked, and malware identified and knowledge reported and shared openly.

But even this will do nothing to stop backdoored firmware (often on commercial routers and other networked devices of real importance for government use – which again opens the possibility of hackers discovering these backdoors) people continue to use instead of refusing to buy hardware with proprietary firmware/software.

Many people will say, “the only safe computer is the one disconnected from any network, wireless, wired, LAN, internet, intranet” but I have seen and you can search yourself for and read about satellite, RF, temperature, TEMPEST (is it illegal in your part of the world to SHIELD your system against some of these APT attacks, especially TEMPEST? And no, it’s not simply a CRT issue), power line and many other attacks which can and do strike computers which have no active network connection, some which have never had any network connection. Some individuals have complained they receive APT attacks throughout their disconnected systems and they are ridiculed and labeled as a nutter. The information exists, some people have gone so far as to scream from the rooftops online about it, but they are nutters who must have some serious problems and this technology with our systems could not be possible.

I believe most modern computer hardware is more powerful than many of us imagine, and a lot of these systems swept from above via satellite and other attacks. Some exploits take advantage of packet radio and some of your proprietary hardware. Some exploits piggyback and unless you really know what you’re doing, and even then… you won’t notice it.

Back to the Windows users, a lot of them will dismiss any strange activity to, “that’s just Windows!” and ignore it or format again and again only to see the same APT infected activity continue. Using older versions of sysinternals, I’ve observed very bizarre behavior on a few non networked systems, a mysterious chat program running which doesn’t exist on the system, all communication methods monitored (bluetooth, your hard/software modems, and more), disk mirroring software running[1], scans running on different but specific file types, command line versions of popular Windows freeware installed on the system rather than the use of the graphical component, and more.

[1] In one anonymous post on pastebin, claiming to be from an intel org, it blasted the group Anonymous, with a bunch of threats and information, including that their systems are all mirrored in some remote location anyway.

[2] Or other government, US used in this case due to the article source and speculation vs. China. This is not to defend China, which is one messed up hell hole on several levels and we all need to push for human rights and freedom for China’s people. For other, freer countries, however, the concentration camps exist but you wouldn’t notice them, they originate from media, mostly your TV, and you don’t even know it. As George Carlin railed about “Our Owners”, “nobody seems to notice and nobody seems to care”.

[3] www.stallman.org/ [stallman.org]

Try this yourself on a wide variety of internet forums and mailing lists, push for malware scanners to scan more than files, but firmware/BIOS. See what happens, I can guarantee it won’t be pleasant, especially with APT cases.

So scan away, or blissfully ignore it, but we need more people like RMS[3] in the world. Such individuals tend to be eccentric but their words ring true and clear about electronics and freedom.

I believe we’re mostly pwned, whether we would like to admit it or not, blind and pwned, yet fiercely holding to misinformation, often due to lack of self discovery and education, and “nobody seems to notice and nobody seems to care”.

##

Schneier has covered it before: power line fluctuations (differences on the wire in keys pressed).

There’s thermal attacks against cpus and temp, also:

ENF (google it)

A treat (ENF Collector in Java):

sourceforge dot net fwdslash projects fwdslash nfienfcollector

No single antimalware scanner exists which offers the ability to scan (mostly proprietary) firmware on AGP/PCI devices (sound cards, graphics cards, usb novelty devices excluding thumb drives), BIOS/CMOS.

If you boot into ultimate boot cd you can use an archane text interface to dump BIOS/CMOS and examine/checksum.

The real attacks which survive disk formats and wipes target your PCI devices and any firmware which may be altered/overwritten with something special. It is not enough to scan your hard drive(s) and thumb drives, the real dangers with teeth infect your hardware devices.

When is the last time you:

Audited your sound card for malware?
Audited your graphics card for malware?
Audited your network card for malware?

Google for:

* AGP and PCI rootkit(s)
* Network card rootkit(s)
* BIOS/CMOS rootkit(s)

Our modern PC hardware is capable of much more than many can imagine.

Do you:

* Know your router’s firmware may easily be replaced on a hacker’s whim?
* Shield all cables against leakage and attacks
* Still use an old CRT monitor and beg for TEMPEST attacks?
* Use TEMPEST resistant fonts in all of your applications including your OS?
* Know whether or not your wired keyboard has keypresses encrypted as they pass to your PC from the keyboard?
* Use your PC on the grid and expose yourself to possible keypress attacks?
* Know your network card is VERY exploitable when plugged into the net and attacked by a hard core blackhat or any vicious geek with the know how?
* Search out informative papers on these subjects and educate your friends and family about these attacks?
* Contact antimalware companies and urge them to protect against many or all these attacks?

Do you trust your neighbors? Are they all really stupid when it comes to computing or is there a geek or two without a conscience looking to exploit these areas?

The overlooked threat are the potential civilian rogues stationed around you, especially in large apartment blocks who feed on unsecured wifi to do their dirty work.

With the recent news of Russian spies, whether or not this news was real or a psyop, educate yourself on the present threats which all antimalware scanners fail to protect against and remove any smug mask you may wear, be it Linux or OpenBSD, or the proprietary Windows and Mac OS you feel are properly secured and not vulnerable to any outside attacks because you either don’t need an antivirus scanner (all are inept to serious attacks) or use one or several (many being proprietary mystery machines sending data to and from your machine for many reasons, one is to share your information with a group or set database to help aid in threats), the threats often come in mysterious ways.

Maybe the ancients had it right: stone tablets and their own unique language(s) rooted in symbolism.

#

I’m more concerned about new rootkits which target PCI devices, such as the graphics card and the optical drives, also, BIOS. Where are the malware scanners which scan PCI devices and BIOS for mismatches? All firmware, BIOS and on PCI devices should be checksummed and saved to match with others in the cloud, and archived when the computer is first used, backing up signed firmware.

When do you recall seeing signed router firmware upgrades with any type of checksum to check against? Same for PCI devices and optical drives and BIOS.

Some have begun with BIOS security:

www.biosbits.org/ [biosbits.org]

Some BIOS has write protection in its configuration, a lot of newer computers don’t.

#

“Disconnect your PC from the internet and don’t add anything you didn’t create yourself. It worked for the NOC list machine in Mission Impossible”

The room/structure was likely heavily shielded, whereas most civvies don’t shield their house and computer rooms. There is more than meets the eye to modern hardware.

Google:

subversion hack:
tagmeme(dot)com/subhack/

network card rootkits and trojans
pci rootkits
packet radio
xmit “fm fingerprinting” software
“specific emitter identification”
forums(dot)qrz(dot)com

how many malware scanners scan bios/cmos and pci/agp cards for malware? zero, even the rootkit scanners. have you checksummed/dumped your bios/cmos and firmware for all your pci/agp devices and usb devices, esp vanity usb devices in and outside the realm of common usb devices (thumbdrives, external hdds, printers),

Unless your computer room is shielded properly, the computers may still be attacked and used, I’ve personally inspected computers with no network connection running mysterious code in the background which task manager for windows and the eqiv for *nix does not find, and this didn’t find it all.

Inspect your windows boot partition in *nix with hexdump and look for proxy packages mentioned along with command line burning programs and other oddities. Computers are more vulnerable than most would expect.

You can bet all of the malware scanners today, unless they are developed by some lone indy coder in a remote country, employ whitelisting of certain malware and none of them scan HARDWARE devices apart from the common usb devices.

Your network cards, sound cards, cd/dvd drives, graphics cards, all are capable of carrying malware to survive disk formatting/wiping.

Boot from a Linux live cd and use hexdump to examine your windows (and *nix) boot sectors to potentially discover interesting modifications by an unknown party.

#
eof

paste.lisp.org/display/131000

Nation of Change, Spam, and bounces.salsalabs.net

Maybe you’ve arrived here because like me, NationofChange.org has been spamming the hell out of your inbox with the help of salsalabs.net. Oddly, gmail refuses to place these emails in the spam bin, regardless of how many times they are reported as spam. I am not sure what to make of this, but I always expect the worst of google, however subtle.

The whois data for NationOfChange.org, which according to geo-IP seems to reside somewhere in Ashburn, VA, is displayed below:

IP Address: 107.20.247.107
Domain ID:D160731998-LROR
Domain Name:NATIONOFCHANGE.ORG
Created On:22-Nov-2010 02:36:42 UTC
Last Updated On:23-Aug-2011 19:16:35 UTC
Expiration Date:22-Nov-2012 02:36:42 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, LLC (R91-LROR)
Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:CR67391199
Registrant Name:Registration Private
Registrant Organization:Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registrant Street1:DomainsByProxy.com
Registrant Street2:14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Scottsdale
Registrant State/Province:Arizona
Registrant Postal Code:85260
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.4806242599
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+1.4806242598
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email: (NATIONOFCHANGE.ORG @domainsbyproxy.com)

——————————————————–

Abridged whois data for bounces.salsalabs.net (www.salsalabs.com) is displayed below:

Host IP: 69.174.82.150
Domain name: salsalabs.com

Administrative Contact:
Salsa Labs, Inc.
Domain Admin [DomainAdmin @salsalabs.com]
+1.2025582807
Fax:
1700 Connecticut Ave NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20009
US

Status: Active

Name Servers:
ns1.salsalabs.com
ns2.salsalabs.com
ns3.salsalabs.com

Creation date: 15 Oct 2007 20:36:00
Expiration date: 15 Oct 2012 20:36:00

Organization: Wired For Change (www.salsalabs.com)

*Wired for Change is associated with The Ford Foundation
————————————————————————————————————–
Maybe politics in Washington has finally burst at the seams and droves of vermin are turning to spam for a new career. But strangely, a lot of admirable organizations seem associated with these networks, though none of which I’ve ever been spammed by. Two factors leave me curious: Gmail does not properly place emails from this source into the spam folder after repeatedly instructing it to do so — AND — They seem to have a lot of content worthy of attention. Odd.

Shooting elephants and free speech | GoDaddy Loves SOPA

I was unaware until yesterday that GoDaddy was an avid supporter of SOPA. Yes, I called in to notify them that I would be transferring several domains because of it, but forgot to mention the elephant. Thinking about it, elephants and the internet have some things in common; they are both endangered to some extent, they are both relatively free, and most good people respect and value them. It seems GoDaddy doesn’t, or at least didn’t until thousands of customers threatened to boycott them.

You’ve got to wonder about anyone who doesn’t mind pissing off millions of people and elephants too — or at least think twice about registering with them.

Pleasant Update: tech.slashdot.org/story/11/12/25/1452251/go-daddy-loses-over-21000-domains-in-one-day

Skype Indicts Users With 661-380-3000

After one fairly-pleasant year of Skype services and the privilege of a restricted (invisible) number, I called a friend who exclaimed “Hey, your number is coming through! Is this the right number?”. I replied with confident and sincere denial and asked him to give me the number masquerading as mine and decided to check into it.

Apparently this number is assigned to many other users too. Whether this number is applied or not, seemingly depends on service-providers and perhaps the time of the call; though I am presently uncertain of the exact criteria for its assignment.

I called several other friends and verified that my actual private number always (and the generic one generally) remains restricted, but occasionally (and unpredictably) is substituted by the following number: 661.380.3000. ATT apparently provides this number to recipients on occasion, but strangely not for every call.

The real trouble is not the number — it is the nature of the message received by those who attempt to call it (661.380.3000) after having it appear on their caller ID. A transcript of the message reads:

The number you have reached is associated with a call that originated from a voice service provider and is not associated with any specific users. Therefore the subscriber who originated the call cannot be reached at this number. Any permission regarding the nature of this call will only be provided in accordance with a lawful request made by the appropriate law enforcement agency. Please report threatening or malicious activities to local law enforcement for further investigation.

Investigation? Malicious activities? WTF?
If I were a business, single woman, or skeptical person of any gender, this would leave an unsettling impression on me. The message never mentions Skype and has a noticeably menacing tone. Why would Skype choose such words? Surely such a message could be made to sound less incriminating or threatening and could certainly be a bit more informative too. If I call someone and – as many people do – they attempt to call me by the number seen on their caller ID, they will be hearing about “law enforcement” and “malicious” behavior. For some callers this would be enough to establish wariness immediately. Who wants that? Below is my comic interpretation of the silliness of Skype’s generic message.
Alice Skypes Bob:

…((((click)))).

Microsoft’s purchase of Skype, coupled with their patent for “legal intercept“, tripled with the inherent insecurity(pdf) of Skype’s encryption, leaves me with an absence of admiration for the company. Though I enjoy the service in general, there is a growing number of things I strongly dislike.

I am not entirely alone here either. An interesting little post found by cryptome can be read here. The article complains of Skype’s unsolicited persuasion of users to fuss with Facebook and frivolously make friends (CIA Intelligence Nodes?). I don’t do facebook, and certainly don’t want my phone service doing it.

Perhaps this generic number is merely to cover their asses, but it sure does sound terrible. Maybe they should return to the old 12345 number; at least it’s harder to take seriously or mistake for a real number. But now that they are owned by Microsoft, I can only expect things to get worse – especially privacy and policy.

*According to wikipedia, area-code 661 includes Kern County California, parts of Los Angeles County, Santa Barbara County, and Tulare County.

“narcissistic vulnerability pimps”

Timeless Quote #001

Old news, yeah; but it’s fun to remember. In case you are wondering WTF a “narcissistic vulnerability pimp” is; according to Verizon, security geeks need only look in the mirror. All others are encouraged to use their imaginations.

But I’ve got to wonder; what does this make me? A “humble vulnerability bitch” perhaps? I have a lot to learn before I reach pimp status, and surely I am years away from being narcissistic about anything. But the day I learn how to use Metasploit effectively, I’m buying myself a big purple fur hat. And until I master at least one form of code, I’m sticking with tennis shoes. As far as Verizon goes, the hooker is calling the hacker nasty names.

McDonald’s Acquitted of Giving Away Free Cookies

According to an article from The Register, Microsoft, McDonald’s and Interclick have been dismissed of a lawsuit accusing them of giving persistent tracking cookies to visitors. Why the hell anyone would ever want to visit a McDonald’s website is beyond my imagination, but while we’re on the topic of nasty cookies, you might also want to look into Kissmetrics.

I have attempted to manage LSO‘s by blocking access in Linux to the .macromedia and .adobe files, and also through the browser addon Better Privacy. But Kissmetrics seem a little trickier to deal with. An extensive article on the wretched little buggers can be read here: ashkansoltani.org/docs/respawn_redux.html

FBI Opens New Sacrament of Penance – Anonplus

Not really, but maybe….

Guilty hackers and inquisitive geeks can now absolve themselves at anonplus.com through an ordained minister of the FBI or DHS. Expect no SSL on this webpage, as it fully complies with the government’s campaign for transparency. Those seeking to redeem themselves from the sinful anonymity of 4chan can now be reborn by either directly visiting the Confessional Booth link, or by asking incriminating questions in the pious forum.

Be off, my binary bovine fiends, and find your peace within your cell. And godspeed!

Sponsored by:

G4S (Wackenhut)
Correctional Services Corporation (CSCQ NASDAQ)
Geo Group
Serco Group
The Rockefeller Foundation
Bilderberg Group
Taser Inc

And the following fictitious titles:
Guilty Textiles Ltd.
Net Neutrality
Eccentric Intelligence Agency, subsidiary of Depend Adult Undergarment Inc.

Ubuntu-Forums Requiring Password to View Posts?

It seems so: netgator.blogspot.com/2011/07/ubuntu-forum-require-password-to-view.html

I just experienced this today myself while searching for a solution to a USB flash-drive bug, and was quite surprised. For years the Ubuntu Forums have been extremely helpful, and an account was only necessary for those wanting to post new threads or leave comments. Now it seems some threads are viewable only by registered users.

I did see a trend a while back though, and clearly remember the forum admins pedantically admonishing people for asking certain questions. Many of these questions would go unanswered until a proper Linux user would come along and offer their knowledge. I remember one thread in particular where someone asked how to access Adobe Flash-files (youtube) on their system for personal purposes, and the admin not only refused to answer, but said the Ubuntu forums would not allow this to be discussed. To me, information is information, and it is up to an individual as to how they apply it or not, and questions regarding the operating system and obscure directories should neither be censored or denied.

Perhaps Ubuntu really is abandoning the spirit of Linux after all. With the many and massive invasions of privacy taking place, the need for some measure of anonymity – especially when merely searching for resolutions to Linux-OS matters – is greater than ever. To see Canonical stepping in the way of privacy is disturbing.

With the recent (and inconsiderate?) introduction of Unity, and an overeagerness to embrace gnome 3, maybe abandoning Canonical is a higher priority than just usability and aesthetics. Could it now be a responsibility?

The only way around it seems to copy/paste the search results, and paste them into Ubuntu’s search box. Then you have to do a little math or grammar below, and answer a random question. This seems to circumvent the stupid default behavior.

Feel free to leave correctional comments if I have made an error. I will gladly admit so if the case is such.

Cyber-Molester Gonna Give You PTSD…and maybe an STD too

Being cyber-stalked is as bad as being raped, or in a war‘ – The Register
For an ‘in context’ explanation of the pre-GIMPed image above, see this link. Borrowed from cryptome.org for purposes of personal madness.

According to the The Register, a research report titled Cyberstalking in the United Kingdom is proposing that the psychological effects of cyber-stalking are comparable to rape, and cause PTSD equivalent to that inflicted by combat or war. If no more than an English phobia, “cyberstalking” probably wont become a new global soap-opera, and will likely only be embraced by a minority of eccentric Brits.

But could this imply a new-but-strange argument for the virtues of privacy; or is it the Onion? I’m all for making new cases to retain what vestiges of privacy we have, but “rape” and “combat”? I have never experienced combat outside the US, but I’ve certainly seen a situation or two for which I was surprised to survive. I remember them well, but cannot recall ever having cold sweats or flashbacks the many times my firewall has gone red, or during audits by mysterious sources. Admittedly, I do find attacks exciting, but unless they compromise my data, I generally find it unnecessary to swallow a handful of Benzodiazepine every time I sign into my google account.

When I first learned of the NSA’s room 641A, it was more interesting than traumatic, and though I felt molested, I never found it necessary to take a shower, get an STD test, or see a psychiatrist. Surely there is no greater cyber-stalker than the NSA or Google? Perhaps CALEA unsettles me a bit, and is no doubt a terrible invasion of privacy along with FISA, warrantless wiretapping, etc; but if I am to accept all similar protocols as rape, I shall be ruined for anyone else!

Even Katherine Albrecht hasn’t made such complaints! Well,.. it has been a while since I’ve watched her excellent lectures, and maybe since then she has covered Facebook. Hmm. Perhaps I should consider this after all. Even thinking of Facebook makes me feel violated. I feel dirty even typing it. Would it be too much to file charges of rape? I could use the financial compensation. Anyone who’s ever seen my etc.hosts file will clearly see that I’ve been traumatized enough to go to such lengths to protect myself. A look at my browser plugins might also indicate efforts at clinical chastity. And come to think of it, I think I may be passing LSOs in my stool.

This is beginning to sound like a nightmare. But how do we stop it considering that it is entirely legal, and even sponsored by governments and private sectors?

*If I am ever virtually raped, I sure hope it’s by a Linux user. They are known to be less biologically active, but when they do get infected, it often packs a serious punch. Just to be safe, I think I might pay a visit to Dr. Norton for a prescription of PC-Cillin. I can definitely foresee my combat skills being hindered by molluscum contagiosum.

Mark of the Beast, Unmasked = E-Verify

Mark of the beast unmasked = E-Verify

See EFF’s article >>>here<<<

This one might summon the need for fresh knickers. A new proposal for a federalized biometric employee surveillance system is here. If successful, no employee will escape it, and their biometric data will forever reside within its putrid belly, floating gaseous and bloated within the cloud (internet). You might even permit some dust on your latest scifi novel for this one, and have a look at the “real thing” first. This is troublesome stuff, and really must be kicked in the face hard enough to break its neck before it eats us all. Yes, this is one of those rare situations where we must all rally together and kick something while it’s down, and make sure it never gets back up, lest we become the product of its greasy rectum for lack of prophylaxis.

This one has the attention of just about every civil-rights organization this side of the big-bang. But it may not be enough considering the insatiable appetite for control inherent in this administration. Notably, both the ACLU and the EFF have taken a stance against this abominable slithering superbitch. They highlight both the apparent and obscure dangers of the proposal, which certainly includes abuse by law enforcement. And the aspect of this thing which might get your attention, is that this data – including the complete dossier of every American – will be managed by private companies.

If you negate the entire sum of my writings to investigate this subject, I will be satisfied. Please see the link at the top of the post, and do so on an empty stomach, or with your favorite picture of the Pentagon nearby.

Microsoft Patent for VOIP (Skype) Lawful Intercept

Source Article: “Microsoft May Add Eavesdropping To Skype ” – ConceivablyTech

In 2009 – a while before acquiring Skype – Microsoft filed a patent on a “Legal Intercept” application specifically for VOIP. In 0028 of the description section, Skype is specifically mentioned. Some of the description terminology includes “silently recording communications”, “Recording Agent”, and other aspects of the protocol to be used.

Considering the inherent insecurity(*1) within Skype technology, and the existing regulations (or lack of) for lawful-interception, I will myself assume it to be soon implemented, if not already so. I know there are some contenders surfacing in the open-source community; but it may be a long time before any of them get the backing necessary to compete with such a giant. But one sure way to help is to experiment and support efforts where they exist. So lets keep open minds and try an alternative.

Requests for further information regarding implementation have so far been ignored by Microsoft.

*1. Skype encryption does not pad data packets, which enables spoken phrases and even entire sentences to be easily deciphered by advanced “listeners”.

WassUp stats not logging IP from anonymouse.org

While examining the WassUp data results of accessing my website via proxy, I noticed that anonymouse.org was not logged despite a dozen visits. I could visit my website as many times as I wanted, and absolutely nothing would show on the WassUp stats. I used 8 other proxies, and all showed on the WassUp stats, including my operating system and browser type. I then looked at older logs, and found a few hits from static.steadfast.net, which had been visiting my site steadily before doing this test. I am not sure what this implies, but I am surprised that WassUp would fail to log multiple visits. Since a whois displayed static.steadfast.net for the IP anonymouse.org was using (193.200.150.82), and that same address (static.steadfast.net) has been logged by WassUp many times before, I am a little confused. Perhaps it is simply doing its job, and going admirably undetected. If so, I guess the extra layer of “anonymity” is good; but I’d like to understand this a bit more.

Please leave a comment if you’ve any suggestions. I will update this post with any answers I find.